Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
30188517Use this thread to share matchids for games that you think the matchmaker did a bad job at. If you can explain what you felt was a problem in it that would be helpful as well.
Do not post matchids for games that were within the past 24 hours from this post. Games older than that are fine and games going forward are fine.
Thanks for the help
lets use this as an example.
If we roughly average the souls given on player death to around 750 over the course of this game, then subtract those death souls from the scores on the Amber hand, we get a much better representation of how the game actually went
on the in-game scoreboard it looks like the abrams was not far behind the rest of the team, so that player probably doesn't even think they did that poorly.
However, when we adjust the souls to account for their deaths in orange, we clearly see they dragged the team down and directly lead to the uneven game. It seems like this should be accounted for more strongly in the player rankings.
It'd be really nice if there were diagetic queues in game to help with macro and positioning. That Abrams player could have heard voice lines like "I'm taking a lot of damage, better be careful" or more instructional "I'll be safer if I stay near this walker".
It can't be lack of games to rank me by. I have over 300 hours. It honestly feels like I'm the only tongue chewer in a lobby full of elite Russian Ritalin abusers with 30ms reaction times and perfect aim...yeah the matchmaking has the same issue as the CS games. It thinks one decent player and five tongue chewing ingrates vs. six "slightly-less-skilled-than-best-player"s is a good match-up. I'm guessing this is for placement matches in the same way CS would do when you were in elo hell.