Recent content by narcissyphus

It should be pretty obvious that this is referring to Viscous' cube, not his mobility. I do like Viscous, I just hate his ult, and so I don't feel like playing him. But Thank you for finally acknowledging what I've been saying [very clearly, actually] over the past 6 pages. No, they mostly had...

No, it's not "it is but it isn't" it's all of these things in a specific way all in one package. people are focusing on one particular thing, saying "but this hero has one of those, and this hero has one of that so why arent you happy?" No, its all or nothing. No, Viscous is not a mobility...

So you're saying that hyper-mobility wouldn't be strong enough by itself in a game where everyone can dash and slide?... This isn't the only game with a high baseline mobility where mobile characters are nevertheless favored. In Apex for example, the top players have always mained movement...

No, I know exactly what I want and that's why I'm definitively saying these characters aren't quite it. This character should feel FAST AND SNAPPY, these characters do not. Lash at times feels floaty, at other times feels awkwardly rooted in place during Ground Strike and his ult. Viscous' ult...

How is that an argument against them though? A high-potential character that can be countered? I just fail to see how this is a bad thing??...

So it seems like most of your argument is "adding more mobility ontop of dashes seems hard to balance". I understand your argument and respectfully disagree-- it may not be straightforward, but there are many ways to balance it -- eg. they have low base stamina, low base HP, maybe their dashes...

...Tracer has 2 mobility skills, technically 4 if you count each charge of blink. If the current characters had multiple charges of their mobility skills, then yes they'd be "mobility characters" by my definition... But they don't Magician currently has one mobility skill, and I said that if he...

League of Legends is the best :D Riot best company

That's a stretch. I know what you're saying, but imo punching yourself around in fights just to juke doesn't feel good the way an ability that's designed for juking would. You're not going to win a duel just from a-d spamming above plat, especially after the recent projectile size increase...

Personally it's not enough for there to be complexity + one mobility skill. The kind of mobility I want is integral to a hero's combat style, like Tracer blinking around. She can blink to get around the map faster, but the primary use case is for juking & bamboozling purposes. Let me put it...

Wraith's cards aren't auto-target though, she has control over their trajectory. When I first read the 1 ability I thought it would work like a mini McGinnis barrage and it sounded cool and fun to use.

Got it. I'm not sure how I feel about 2 auto-target abilities... Also, it seems like he doesn't waveclear unless his 1 also targets creeps.

Aesthetically perfect. Not sure if I understand how 1 works. Is it ground-targeted or hero-targeted? Is it a chanelled ability? Re: 3 - Is this an enemy targetted ability or a skillshot or ?.... It's unclear how mechanically interesting the abilities would feel, but the concept is very appealing.

Love the mobility and bamboozling potential! Part of me wants the ult to not be random though, would be more fun and dynamic IMO.

I really don't think you can lay the blame on f2p pvp games, I've played all the MOBAs and hero shooters, posted on all the communities. And it needs be said that the Valve/Dota community specifically set the precent for nerd elitism.